Radiographic Validation of Self Reported Line Drawings for Hallux Valgus: A Valid Virtual Self Reporting Tool in General Practise?

Talk Code: 
P1.25.1
Presenter: 
Aranghan Lingham
Co-authors: 
V Gupta, M Marshall M, T Rathod-Mistry, H Menz, E Roddy
Author institutions: 
East Sussex Hospital NHS Trust, University Hospital of Coventry and Warwickshire, School of Medicine, Keele University, School of Allied Health Human Services and Sport La Trobe University Australia, Haywood Academic Rheumatology Centre Midlands Partnership NHS Foundation Trust

Problem

Hallux valgus (HV) is a common condition in general practice. Clinical and radiographic assessment is the gold standard, however during the current COVID pandemic and as part of a general move to virtual consultations, this is not always possible. HV line-drawings, consisting of five drawings for each foot depicting a sequential increase in HV angle of 15 degrees, have been developed and clinically validated for self-reporting severity . We aimed to undertake radiographic validation of the self-report HV line-drawing instrument.

Approach

Adults aged ≥50 from four GP practices in North Staffordshire were sent a health survey. Responders self-reported HV by selecting the line-drawing that best represented the angulation of the great toe whilst standing. Those reporting foot pain in the last year were invited to attend a research clinic where foot radiographs were taken from which intermetatarsal, hallux abductus and hallux interphalangeal abductus angles were calculated. Ten feet were randomly selected for each HV line-drawing grade for left and right feet. Associations between self-reported HV line drawings and radiographic measurements were assessed using Spearman’s p correlation coefficients, mean radiographic angle measurement (95% Confidence Interval) and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA).

Findings

Self-reported HV line drawing severity of 0, 15, 30, 45, and 60 degrees showed an associated radiographic hallux abductus angle mean and (95% CI) of 7.7 (8.8, 10.2), 12.6 (9.8, 15.8), 20.7 (16.9, 24.5), 28.4 (23.9, 32.9), 43.1 (33.2, 53). Differences in radiographic measures between the HV line drawing grades were significant for intermetatarsal angle (F= 13.98, p<0.001) and hallux abductus angle (F= 38.895, p<0.001) but not hallux interphalangeal abductus angle (F=2.205, p=0.075).

Increasing self-reported HV line-drawing grade was positively correlated with radiographic measurements for intermetatarsal angle and hallux abductus angle (Spearman’s Rho=0.602, p<0.000; 0.821, p<0.001 respectively). Hallux interphalangeal abductus angle showed an inverse correlation with increasing HV angle severity (-0.204, p=0.053).

 

Consequences

Self-report of HV severity by line-drawings provides a valid representation of the deformity determined from radiographic measurements, suggesting that line-drawings could be used for virtual self-report of HV to GPs to guide treatment and referral .

Submitted by: 
Aranghan Lingham
Funding acknowledgement: 
This work was funded by an Arthritis Research UK Programme Grant (18174), and service support through West Midlands North CLRN. HBM is currently a National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia Senior Research Fellow (ID: 1135995 ).