Operational failures and how they influence the work of general practitioners: A qualitative study in primary care

Talk Code: 
V.8
Presenter: 
Carol Sinnott
Twitter: 
Co-authors: 
Alexandros Georgiadis, Mary Dixon-Woods
Author institutions: 
THIS Institute (The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute), University of Cambridge; ICON Plc, The Translation & Innovation Hub Building, Imperial College London

Problem

General practice faces a workforce recruitment and retention crisis. While the pressures experienced by General Practitioners (GPs), including unmanageable workloads, the complexity of patients’ needs and policy expectations to move more care from hospitals to the community have been well documented, there has been less focus on whether the wider health system facilitates the work of GPs by supporting an efficient primary care work environment.This study aims to understand what and how system-level operational failures in the primary care work environment interfere with and influence GPs’ work, with a view to identifying failures that may be tractable to improvement.

Approach

We conducted a qualitative interview study, using “operational failures”- defined as disruptions, inadequacies or errors in the information, supplies, or equipment needed for patient care - as a sensitising concept. Twenty-one GPs were recruited via the East of England Clinical Research Network, using criteria of length of time since qualification, location, and practice size. The technique of chart-stimulated recall was utilised during interviews. Analysis was based on the constant comparative method.

Findings

Operational failures experienced by GPs arose mainly from inadequate channels of communication external to their own practices, but also related to problems in practice technology and suboptimal distribution of work within practices. GPs were obliged to undertake compensatory labour to fulfil their duties of overseeing, coordinating and safeguarding patients’ care. Though individual operational failures often took only minutes to resolve, the additional strain they imposed in the context of already stretched daily schedules, threatened job satisfaction, patient safety and the quality of care. Though GPs often believed that working around these problems was the simplest solution, compensatory labour may be counterproductive in the longer term by keeping problems obscured as learning opportunities.

Consequences

Operational failures within general practices and the wider healthcare system interfere with and configure GPs’ work and signal system-level weaknesses that cause pressure within the primary care work environment. Using failure occurrence as a trigger for improvement efforts at a local and collective level will be critical to making the primary care work environment more attractive and efficient.

Submitted by: 
Carol Sinnott
Funding acknowledgement: 
This work has been supported by an NIHR (UK) Clinical Lectureship, an Academy for Medical Sciences (UK) Starter Grant (SGL018\1023) and Mary Dixon-Woods’ Wellcome Trust Senior Investigator Award (WT09789). MDW is supported by the Health Foundation's grant to the University of Cambridge for The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute. The Health Foundation is an independent charity committed to bringing about better health and healthcare for people in the United Kingdom. MDW is a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Senior Investigator (NF-SI-0617-10026. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the National Institute for Health Research, the Department of Health and Social Care, the Health Foundation, the Academy for Medical Sciences or the Wellcome Trust.