Criteria for the assessment of Workshops
Workshops will be judged by two peer reviewers using a scale of 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent) for each of the following criteria:
1. Feasibility
- are the aims and objectives likely to be achieved within the timeframe?
2. Structure / format
- is there a structured and appropriate outline of the workshop and do any educational materials highlighted appear relevant?
3. Topicality
- is the workshop looking at issues of interest / relevance at the present time?
4. Potential for widespread interest
- will this appeal to an appropriate range of SAPC delegates – researchers and teachers in primary care (medical and non-medical)?
5. Likelihood of provoking discussion
- subject of undoubted relevance to primary care, likely to be an important contribution to the discipline