Skip to main content

The SAPC website is currently undergoing reconstruction. If you have any questions or comments then please get in touch.

Evaluating ethnic variations in the risk of infections presenting to primary and secondary care in people with pre-diabetes and type 2 diabetes: a matched cohort study

Problem

People living with type 2 diabetes have a higher infection risk. However, it is unknown how this risk varies by ethnicity, or whether this risk is similarly observed in people with non-diabetic hyperglycaemia (“pre-diabetes”). The study has examined the magnitude of infection risks among adults with type 2 diabetes or pre-diabetes in England, and whether patterns of risk were similar in people from different ethnic groups.

Approach

Using Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD), patients in England aged 18-90 with pre-diabetes, and type 2 diabetes, alive on 1/1/2015 were matched to patients without diabetes. Each individual with type 2 diabetes was matched to two patients without diabetes or prediabetes on age, sex and ethnic group. Ethnicity was categorised into five broad categories: White, South Asian, Black, Mixed/Other and missing ethnicity. Infections during 2015-2019 were collated from primary care [CPRD Aurum] and linked hospitalisation records, and included any infection with a prescription in primary care for an antibiotic, antifungal or antiviral within +/- 14 days of the diagnosis or any new hospital episode where an infection was the primary diagnosis. Infection incidence rate ratios (IRR) for pre- or type 2 diabetes were estimated with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI).

Findings

Of the 527,151 people with type 2 diabetes, 69.9%, 10.4%, 4.3% and 5.8% were of White, South Asian, Black, Mixed/Other ethnicity respectively, with 9.7% missing. There was an increased risk for infections in people with type 2 diabetes presenting in primary care (IRR = 1.51, 95%CI 1.51-1.52) and hospitalisations (IRR = 1.91, 1.90-1.93). Overall, within each ethnic group, this was broadly consistent regardless of underlying differences in age and deprivation, and seen for all specific infection types considered, though younger (age <50) people with type 2 diabetes of White ethnicity experienced a greater relative risk. For pre-diabetes (n = 273,216), a significant but smaller risk was seen for primary care (IRR = 1.35, 95%CI 1.34-1.36) and hospitalisations (IRR = 1.33, 95%CI 1.31-1.35); similar within each ethnicity for primary care infections, but less consistent for infection-related hospitalisations. In the population, 5.3% of primary care and 8.9% of hospitalisation infections were attributable to pre-diabetes or type 2 diabetes.

Consequences

Our study estimated an elevated risk of infection for people with type 2 diabetes in England, that was broadly similar in each major ethnic group. An increased relative risk of infections was also seen in people with pre-diabetes compared to people without diabetes. Infections are therefore a significant cause of ill health and health service use across both primary and secondary care for people with pre-diabetes and type 2 diabetes. Given the rising prevalence of type 2 diabetes and pre-diabetes, the burden of infections will continue to have public health implications.