2018 workshop review criteria
Criteria for the assessment of Workshops
Workshops will be judged against the following criteria by two independent peer reviewers using a scale of 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent) for each of the following criteria:
Is the workshop topic important, interesting and relevant to primary care and likely to appeal to SAPC delegates?
Are the learning objectives of the workshop clear, relevant and achievable
3. Educational methods
Do the authors suggest appropriate pedagogical methods to achieve the learning objectives?
Is the proposed format of the workshop likely to provoke discussion and interaction between workshop participants?
In addition to the criteria described above, peer reviewers will also be asked to indicate (on a scale from 1 - 10) the extent to which this submission aligns with conference themes and aims as described in the call for abstracts (e.g. learning from Europe; populations on the move; expert generalism; novel methodologies).